Humberto wrote: "It could both ways.
A military-political complex could develop an intelligent machine designed to destroy the enemies of that regime. Given the nature of our leaders, the enemies are the poor, those that have a different ethnic look and those that are the 47% whose vote they don't care about. This is scary. I think the military should be prohibited from developing artificial intelligence. By the way this destruction machine need not be too intelligent. An IQ of an animal would be enough.
On the other hand, the artificial intelligence could be more intelligent, and rational, than it's creators and decide to help us.
In my series 'living dangerously in utopia' I present an artificial intelligence who matures by emulating a human female. Thereby falling in love with her man. The trio saves the world, to make it short.
I also wrote 'Practical Artificial Intelligence'
Where I deal with this friendly/unfriendliness situation. "
Some AI researchers share your belief in a military regime creating an unfriendly AI. Also as Jaime said, the creators miss something and having it totally blow past us, some are working to try and prevent that as best they can. A good discussion of this is found in:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18489235-the-hanson-yudkowsky-ai-foom-debate
Though I haven’t read your book yet, I plan to, I did notice in the description you provide a timeline. Does that timeline extend to when the first AI with actual turning style intelligence will emerge?
Writing MagTech made me realized a lot of moral and social issues need addressing as we plunge into a future filled with technology. My book is set in the year 2226, two hundred years in the future. I chose that because brain augmentation may be fully mainstream by the year 2026. That is only twelve years from now, in regard to the advancement of technology it is a lifetime. By the year 2020 mankind’s knowledge will double every 72 hours. This blog will attempt to further the debate:
No comments:
Post a Comment